United they stand!

Never in the field of Conservation have so many owed so much to so few!

PR release from representation of over 350,000 members:

The Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland,

the John Muir Trust,

the Mountaineering Council of Scotland,

the Munro Society,

the National Trust for Scotland,

Ramblers Scotland,

The Scottish Rights of Way and Access Society

and the Scottish Wild Land Group

4 July 2013

Organisations unite to call for enhanced wild land protection

In an unprecedented move, as MSPs return to their constituencies for the summer parliamentary recess, eight organisations concerned with conservation, wild lands and access to the countryside have jointly issued an open letter calling for greater protection for Scotland’s landscapes.

Leaders of the organisations – The Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland, the John Muir Trust, the Mountaineering Council of Scotland, the Munro Society, the National Trust for Scotland, Ramblers Scotland, The Scottish Rights of Way and Access Society and the Scottish Wild Land Group – between them representing over 350,000 members, welcome moves by the Scottish Government and Scottish Natural Heritage to safeguard Scotland’s landscapes but say that their existing proposals do not go far enough:

“We support the increased protection proposed for National Parks and National Scenic Areas, although this merely formalises the present de facto position.

“Such protection should apply also where development is proposed beyond their boundaries that would impact on the very qualities they were established to safeguard.”

In the letter, the organisations also question whether or not the wording of the draft Scottish Planning Policy and National Planning Framework is tight enough:

“The current draft states that (in National Nature Reserves and other important areas) wind power developments will be acceptable ‘where it can be demonstrated that any significant effects on the qualities for which the area is identified can be substantially improved by siting, design or mitigation.’

“This will allow inappropriate developments to be approved because of lack of clarity in using subjective words such as ‘significant’ and ‘substantially’ when set against the primacy afforded in government policy to economic and energy development.”

The organisations also raise concern that local democratic processes may be undermined by national-level decision-making:

“If local authorities and their electorates think particular local landscapes are important then this should not be over-ridden nationally.”

Speaking on behalf of the eight organisations, the Chairman of the National Trust for Scotland, Sir Kenneth Calman said:

“As MSPs return to their constituencies over the summer we hope that all, whether in Government or opposition, give serious consideration to the landscape around them and what it represents for the people they represent.

“Recent surveys, such as the one undertaken by the John Muir Trust and one conducted by my own charity, show that a majority of Scots are very greatly concerned about the future of our wild lands and local landscapes. This is why we have come together to put our names to this open letter – our landscapes need better protection and this is what the people of Scotland want.

“Our iconic landscapes are key to our economic and environmental future and our collective wellbeing – they must not be sacrificed to over-development through oversight or short-term thinking.”

Text of Letter:

4 July 2013

Sir,

As a group of eight organisations with over 350,000 members who value Scotland’s high quality landscapes we commend the Scottish Government for recognising the value of Scotland’s wild land, which is without price.  However, we must emphasise that all impacts upon valued areas need to be managed, not simply developments within such areas.  We feel that the Scottish Government, Scottish Natural Heritage and other organisations must now use all relevant policies to safeguard the experiential qualities that make Scotland’s landscapes so valuable to residents and visitors.

 

We welcome the growing recognition in national government of the importance of Scotland’s landscapes and the need to ensure their special qualities are not lost through unsuitable development.  The current government consultations on the Scottish Planning Policy and the National Planning Framework are an opportunity to set the national planning rules for many years to come.

 

We support the increased protection proposed for National Parks and National Scenic Areas, though this merely formalises the present de facto position.  Such protection should apply also where development is proposed beyond their boundaries that would impact upon the very qualities they were established to safeguard.  While the current greatest threat is large onshore wind developments, the same considerations should apply equally to any large development proposal, including transmission lines.

 

We fully support the recognition of the importance of wild land but are very concerned at the level of protection proposed for these and other important areas such as National Nature Reserves.  The current draft states that in such areas wind power developments will be acceptable “where it can be demonstrated that any significant effects on the qualities for which the area is identified can be substantially overcome by siting, design or mitigation.”  This will allow inappropriate developments to be approved because of the lack of clarity in using subjective words such as “significant” and “substantially” when set against the primacy afforded in government policy to economic and energy development.  Core Areas of Wild Land as defined by Scottish Natural Heritage should be given the same level of protection as National Scenic Areas, including protection from visually intrusive developments beyond their boundaries.  Several current planning applications lie within Core Areas of Wild Land.  They must be rejected now if there is to be substance to the government’s affirmation of wild land’s importance.

 

We are concerned at the proposal that locally significant landscapes, designated as such by local councils, should be regarded nationally as areas where there are “opportunities for wind farm development”.  If local authorities and their electorates think particular local landscapes are important then this should not be over-ridden nationally.

 

The consultations close on 23 July.  Our members will expect the outcome to be a planning framework that ensures no more of Scotland’s iconic landscapes are damaged.

 

Charles Strang, Convenor, Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland

John Hutchison, Chairman, John Muir Trust

Brian Linington, President, Mountaineering Council of Scotland

Eleanore Hunter, President, The Munro Society

Sir Kenneth Calman, Chairman, National Trust for Scotland

David Thomson, Convener, Ramblers Scotland

George Menzies, Chairman, Scottish Rights of Way and Access Society

John Milne, Co-ordinator, Scottish Wild Land Group

 

Advertisements

About Dougal Quixote

Slightly mad. Always believes a cup is half full so continues to tilt at Wind Turbines and the politicians that seem to believe it is their god given right to ruin Scotland for a pot of fool's gold.
This entry was posted in Wind farms. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s