A local landowner has invested £4 million in a number of eco chalets (Eagle Brae) and is now faced with this horror of horrors right in front of his investment. The SNP party talk about investing in Scotland, oblivious to the fact that wind farms invest in German or Danish equipment and engineers, pay often absentee landowners vast sums of money and load us with the cost of this expensive unreliable energy. It is of no satisfaction that one translation of ‘carach’, the invented name of this wind farm, is “un-reliable”. The fact is that contra to the doctrine of wind developers ‘investing’ in Scotland(raping it is more accurate), the truth is that many tourism operators such as Eagle Brae will not invest in Scotland and more importantly will not bring the much needed jobs to the Highlands if they are not protected from such a damaging proposal. Scottish Tourism currently employs 250,000 and generates £40 billion in income. Rather different to the 2,000 employees in the wind industry and the very negative cash flow they “generate”. After all for every £1 of energy sold over the border the vast majority will disappear abroad to service the debt, to line the pockets of the developers or to the off-shore banks of the landowners. The 1 or 2p of community benefit will have simply been skimmed from the subsidies we pay. Suggestions have been voiced that strike prices will in future be paid from taxes instead of subsidies, much vaunted by the EU. Are we that stupid? Who pay the TAXES? We do! Nothing will change but it will be like handing you back your change whilst the DECC have their hand in your wallet!
- How to really annoy your neighbours. Buy an electric car!
- Stranded Assets
- Reality – Personified
- Scottish Wind Power Company Attempts to Cover Up Turbine Collapse
- The Future
- Not the best start of the year for the Wind Industry
- When will they grow up?
- Merry Christmas to you all!
- Raw deal for Green House Gases
Wind V. Coal
Quote of the Decade
"The trouble with wind farms is that they have a very large spatial footprint for a piddling little bit of electricity. You would need 8oo turbines to produce the output of a coal-fired power station."
Sir Martin Holgate, Chief Scientist at the Department of the Environment of the British Government - October 2004
Death by a Thousand Turbines
- Energy Consents
- Kilmorack Wind Fm
- Political Comments
- The Blimp
- The Dummies Guide
Einstein on Consensus in ScienceAs Einstein once said,"It does not take a hundred scientists to prove me right ( consensus ?). It only takes one to prove me wrong"
- 128,311 views
Most recent comments
douglas pocock on Power to the Pococks andreasmarciniak on Stranded Assets andreasmarciniak on Reality – Personified Brenda on Reality – Personified Dougal Quixote on Energy Density of Wood v.…
Swamped by a Hundred Hydros