It could happen here. In fact it already has! Highest petrol costs in Europe, carbon tax and Renewable Obligation, Subsidies!
Gotta repost my game from early 2014, just to remind everyone that not one damned thing has changed in complacent Ontariowe. People are still willing to sit back and do nothing about the thieves who have destroyed this province.
From 2014: “With more and more families in Ontario entering Energy Poverty, thanks to the insane policies of the Liberal Party, many are now finding themselves sitting in the dark at night. This has spawned a resurgence in board games and the newest rage in board games is the Ontario Liberal Party version of Monopoly.”
Oh there are TWO major changes. The province now has THREE socialist parties to choose from. Each one just as bad as the others. With Liberal plant, Patrick Brown now leading the Conservatives, Ontariowe is truly screwed as he supports Wynnes carbon tax scam. Ontario lost it’s last chance to turn that province around in the…
View original post 94 more words
Coming to a Country near you!
Terence Corcoran — Financial Post — October 6, 2016
Back in 2010, deep green environmentalist Rick Smith, then head of Environmental Defence Canada, hailed Ontario’s Green Energy and Green Economy Act regime as a cost-free operation that would catapult the province into the big leagues of renewable energy. Through fat subsidies and high prices offered to wind, solar and other renewable industry players, jobs and growth would boom and Ontario would be free of its dirty coal plants. It was the End of Coal, the government said. The birth of a renewable miracle.
Asked whether the plan might lead to higher prices for consumers, “No,” said Dr. Smith — he likes to be called doctor in recognition of his PhD in biology. “No. Not at all.”
Smith was absolutely sure that Ontario’s campaign to become the North American leader in renewable energy would not be a burden on consumers. He…
View original post 44 more words
Every few years the wind industry or the Scottish Government roll out a Tourist Report that claims wind farms don’t damage tourism. We had the Moffat report which had more holes than a colander and the report on the Solway Firth which claimed that the projected damage to tourism in the area would not impact on any other area in Scotland. We have now had the Biggar report which conveniently includes all urban visitors in it’s analysis amongst many other other inaccuracies. How many Wind Farms are built in urban environs? The John Muir Trust has taken them to task and has produced a very interesting response by Douglas Wyn BSc(Soc), MSc(Econ). A detailed read but well worth the effort.
Following on Lyndsey Ward’s world acclaimed Subsidy Sam we now have the new and latest work of Lyndsey and Josh which is more aimed at educating children and countering the deceit of the Wind Farm Industry. Either download as a PDF or contact Josh for a hard copy.
I wonder how many schools will be prepared to expose the children to the truth?
Tiny the Turbine (Donations can be made through this site as well as orders for hard copy)
Tiny_the_turbine(PDF download available here)
For those that missed Subsidy Sam
“CLEXIT” (CLimate Exit) was inspired by the Brexit decision of the British people to withdraw from the increasingly dictatorial grasp of the EU bureaucracy.
Without any publicity or serious recruiting, Clexit has attracted over 60 well-informed science, business and economic leaders from 16 countries.
The secretary of Clexit, Mr Viv Forbes from Australia, said that widespread enforcement of the Paris climate treaty would be a global tragedy.
“For the EU and the rest of the Western world, ratification and enforcement of the Paris Treaty (and all the other associated decrees and Agendas) would herald the end of low-cost hydrocarbon transport and electricity, and the exit of their manufacturing, processing and refining industries to countries with low-cost energy.
“For developing countries, the Paris Treaty would deny them the benefits of reliable low-cost hydrocarbon energy, compelling them to rely on biomass heating and costly weather-dependent and unreliable power supplies, thus prolonging and increasing their dependency on international handouts. They will soon resent being told to remain forever in an energy-deprived wind/solar/wood/bicycle economy.
“Perhaps the most insidious feature of the UN climate plan is the “Green Climate Fund”. Under this scheme, selected nations (“The rich”) are marked to pour billions of dollars into a green slush fund. The funds will then be used to bribe other countries (“developing and emerging nations”) into adopting silly green energy policies.
“Naturally some smart politicians and speculators in the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and in the small island nations, understand that they can profit from the Paris Treaty by gaming the rules on things like carbon credits, or milking the green fund for “climate compensation” or “green energy technology”. This will only work for a while, and when the handouts stop, the re-adjustment to reality will be very painful.
“This UN-driven war on carbon energy has already caused massive losses and dislocation of western industry. If allowed to continue as envisaged by the Paris Treaty, this economic recession will become a world-wide depression, and all nations will suffer.
“We must stop this futile waste of community savings; cease the destruction and dislocation of human industry; stop killing rare bats and birds with wind turbine blades and solar/thermal sizzlers; stop pelletising trees and shipping them across the world to feed power stations designed to burn coal; stop converting food to motor vehicle fuel; and stop the clearing of bush and forests for biofuel cultivation and plantations.”
“Carbon dioxide does not control the climate. It is an essential plant food and more carbon dioxide will produce more plant growth and a greener globe.”
More detail is given in “The Clexit Founding Statement” that follows.
Rosevale Qld Australia
Ever wondered how the Moy Wind farm can power a Mars Bar Factory 300 miles away with their renewable energy that only works part time. Ever wondered how Lochluichart can supply local (?) consumers with 100% renewable energy 100% of the time even when it isn’t working and using an energy supplier based in Warwick in the centre of England. The answer as they say ‘is blowing in the wind’. It is the latest wind farm scam. Otherwise known as Renewable Energy Guarantee of Origin (REGO) certificates. These are batched with ROCs. As ROCs are traded separately as well as batched with power one concludes that it is entirely possible to buy ROCs and REGOs without actually buying any energy from a specific wind farm. Now we know that wind energy coupled with ROCs is twice the price and as much as four times the price of conventional power so we much assume that if power supply is only balanced against 100% renewable certificates the tariff would be at least twice and as much as four times the rate of standard supply. If not then they are noting using 100% wind energy. So the scam is to use the certificates against purchase of the green tariff whilst balancing the costs by buying nuclear or fossil fuel power. Now if they referred to this as full time equivalent or supplies will be balanced against our REGOs that would be honest, if a mite pointless, but the industry quotes 100% renewable energy from your local wind farm. Now that is dishonest and a scam. Needless to say the ASA have accepted the claims of the energy suppliers as power laid off against held certificates (REGOs) is 100% renewable energy. I think this turns on it’s head the maxim “you can fool some of the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time”. This is designed to fool all of the people all of the time!
One REGO is issued for each megawatt hour (MWh) of eligible renewable output generated (with effect from 5 December 2010). Prior to 5 December 2010 one REGO was issued for each kilowatt hour (kWh) of eligible renewable output generated. The primary use of REGOs in Great Britain and Northern Ireland is for Fuel Mix Disclosure (FMD). FMD requires licensed electricity suppliers to disclose to their customers, and potential customers, the mix of fuels (coal, gas, nuclear, renewable and other) used to generate the electricity supplied annually. Source: Ofgem
As you can see these are now being used beyond their remit.
and put the following in copy Bcc: email@example.com,
You may write in the language of your choice, as I trust they will translate as needed.
Thank you for your cooperation in this important collective endeavour.
Solar is not something I comment on often partly because I was told years ago that it was useless north of Cornwall.
If you keep an eye on the financial world, which I do, and especially the green sectors, which I also do, it’s been an interesting time of late. Within the last few weeks, Solar Trust of America (STA), owner of the world’s largest solar plant, filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11, and nobody expects much of it, if anything, to emerge from it. STA joins a long list of companies in the solar energy sector, who’ve gone bankrupt, ducked into protection from their creditors, suspended production indefinitely or are simply circling the plughole.
Across the world, a few of the more prominent and expensive casualties are Solyndra, Solar Millennium AG, Energy Conversion Devices Inc, Q-Cells, Solon, Solar Millenium, Solarhybrid, Ener1, Range Fuels, Beacon Power Corp and there’s a whole lot of others. In case you haven’t noticed, it’s probably not a good idea to invest your hard-earned pennies in any company with “solar” in its…
View original post 1,815 more words
Well what effect will Brexit have on the wind turbines? Well they won’t turn any faster, that’s for sure. It is a fact that the EU is the architect of all the legislations that have closed fossil fuel power stations and encouraged wind development. That we are in a muckle has little to do with Brexit and has much to do with career politicians who are using this as an opportunity to promote their own interests. The Parliamentary Labour Party hated Corbyn as they see a future Labour Party as being unelectable and their futures destroyed by ‘The People’. And you thought Labour was for the working man. I think Schulz comment would fine favour with most Labour MPs. Now I don’t support Corbyn’s Politics and one might suggest he is the guarantee of Conservative supremacy for a generation. However as in the referendum it is the will of the people. So let’s consider the Conservatives. In a period which craves stability, Cameron has picked up his tiddly winks and gone off in a huff. Hunt, after making a pigs ear of the Junior Doctor’s strike suggests that he is the Statesman for PM and Osborne after attempting to stabilise the market has reverted to Project Fear. They really couldn’t run a booze up in a brewery. Boris quite understandably (?) went off to play cricket. Well what else would a quintessentially Englishman do? Except of course he has been spending the last ten days telling us that he is actually the progeny of Turkish immigrants. Now the rest of us might suggest that what we need is stable leadership and statesman like qualities from our leaders. I simply fail to understand the Glasgie Fishwife and the SNP. The logic of wanting independence but then wanting to give it away to a European Super State leaves me and many others lost for words. What we are left with is a political void.
So what of the future as to wind farms. Well in that we are as unsure as the rest. A new administration with a new PM is uncertain. We have Amber Rudd, a keen Remainer, and Andrea Leatham, a Brexiter. In the event of a Brexit PM we might suggest that Amber Rudd will be back to the back benches and Andrea could look forward to high office. But where does that leave Energy. We didn’t like Fergus Ewing as Minister for Energy, amongst other things, in Scotland but his replacement in the form of Keith Brown and Paul Wheelhouse leaves us much worse off. The only consolation is that Westminster have canned the subsidy for onshore wind. However with Hinckley Point in the ‘gift’ of the French Government owned Electricite de France and already mired in complex boardroom disagreement a quick fix by an inexperienced and poorly advised but enthusiastically lobbied new Secretary of State could bode ill for those ‘hosting’ wind.
Negotiations with the EU on trade will without doubt be influenced by the multi billion euro deals of companies like Seimens, Vesta and Dong. To lose the energy business of the UK to China, the US, Canada or India would be a disaster for northern Europe manufacture. As we buy far more from Europe than we sell them and sell far more to the US the cards are in our hand. Problem is are those holding the cards in Whitehall and Westminster capable of playing a good hand or just twist and fold. In the end Commerce should dictate the future as it is the man of commerce that can lead us to the promised land, not here today gone tomorrow politicians. Let us hope that it does not end up as a tit for tat game of import levies. I think we would all agree that there are more questions than answers at the moment and what we need is a period of calm and careful consideration. As Europe staggers to a more centralised model in the wake of Brexit much against the wishes of most of Europe’s people one does wonder if they have learnt anything. They certainly aren’t listening to the people. What is frustrating is that had the Eurocrats and Brussels elite listened to Cameron and accepted his concerns much of this breast beating need never have happened. If he had returned with a good deal on the table, not one discredited by Junkers and Scultz before Cameron got out of the Eurostar at St. Pancras, Brexit would have remained Farage’s dream. In my view the EU has become too large, too cumbersome and too expensive to survive. Ambitions of a European Army, a central tax regime, an EU law very different to our Habeas Corpus and almost ‘thought control’ are simply not what we signed up for. Regrettably the fairly fine division of the vote rather than the clear mandate of 1975 has left Democracy the loser as the oft practised European habit of new Referenda until you get the answer you require is as prevalent in the Remainers as in the Scottish Nationalists.
In my mind there is still time for the EU to come to the table and address the issues, to emasculate the unelected Eurocrats and provide the UK with an acceptable and progressive plan. Will they do so? Do turkeys vote for Christmas?
The book of the year has been revamped with additional pictures by Josh. Feel free to pass around Subsidy Sam
Read the story as told in the Press and Journal.
A forthright and well deserved attack on the RSPB
James Delingpole, hot on the hypocrisy trail, pops up a fair and reasonable poser: who protects Britain’s birds from its Royal Society for the Protection of Birds? (BTW: We’ve added a few graphics to help James make his point).
RSPB: We must build more bird-chopping eco cruifixes
26 May 2016
Britain must build thousands more bat-chomping bird-slicing eco crucifixes in order to stave off “dangerous climate change” says the RSPB.
RSPB stands for Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and, no, this is not The Onion.
Yes, Britain’s oldest and biggest ornithological society really has put out a report demanding the erection of yet more avian Cuisinarts – despite swathes of evidence showing that these monstrosities are responsible for killing many millions of birds around the world every year.
The way that we currently use energy in…
View original post 1,521 more words
Wind in the Gallows: Study Shows Badgers Suffer Merciless Stress & Torment from Wind Turbine Noise & Vibration
Simplest logic defies the wind developers and their political supporters.
The Wind in the Willows (Kenneth Grahame) has been a childhood favourite for more than a century. The exploits of Toad, Rat, Mole and the elusive but respected Mr Badger, stand as an allegory of what is deemed worthy in the British concept of character, and their understanding of what constitutes good and bad manners.
Toad, as master of Toad Hall, entertains a number of self-destructive but fleeting obsessions, including boating and caravanning, which brings him into conflict with his long-suffering friends, Rat and Mole; and, eventually, the law.
It is the sober Mr Badger who is enlisted to help rein in Toad’s natural excesses: Mr Badger is horrified to learn that Toad has crashed no less than seven motorcars, has been hospitalised three times and has racked up a fortune in fines for his reckless motoring escapades.
Leading the charge, Mr Badger attempts to instill some commonsense and moral…
View original post 2,709 more words
Moy wind farm assassinates RSPB icon. Yes that’s true. An Osprey was seriously injured by one of the Moy Turbines and the Energen employee called the SPCA who took it to the vet who had no choice, such were it’s injuries, but to euthanase it. RSPB admitted that it was only twenty miles from their Loch Garten Osprey site. (Well within the feeding range of an Osprey). The RSPB spokeswoman seemed to suggest that it was not the Turbines fault and “If Collision is confirmed as the cause of death we will work with the developer to thoroughly assess how the incident occurred” Reading the small print the developer will cross RSPB’s palms with silver. Post mortem results confirm that the bird had multiple fractures to it’s right wing which is consistent with it having collided with a wind turbine. However the Developer is awaiting toxicology reports. What does she suggest. It was high on speed and that is why it was hit by the turbine. It’s the Osprey fault and RSPB agree! The RSPB should hold their heads in shame. Protection, no! Persecution of Birds!
Legal Status – Osprey
The osprey is afforded the highest degree of legal protection under Schedule 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
It is an offence to intentionally take, injure or kill an osprey or to take, damage or destroy its nest, eggs or young. It is also an offence to intentionally or recklessly disturb the birds close to their nest during the breeding season. Violation of the law can attract fines up to £5,000 per offence and/or a prison sentence of up to six months.
The Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 widens this protection and provides additional protection for the osprey in Scotland.
Protection of wildlife
(introduced by section 50)
1The 1981 Act is amended as follows.
Protection of birds: offences
2(1)Section 1 (protection of wild birds etc.) is amended as follows.
(2)In subsection (1)—
(a)after “intentionally” insert “ or recklessly ”,
(b)in paragraph (b), for “or destroys” substitute “ , destroys or otherwise interferes with ”,
Why haven’t the Police made an arrest yet? I am sure if you or I put put something that killed an Osprey we would not be treated so leniently!
And the Moy Estate has a long record.
Regular blog readers will probably remember what was found on Moy Estate in 2010:
A dead red kite in the back of a gamekeeper’s vehicle. It had two broken legs and had died as a result of a blow to the head.
The remains of a further two dead red kites.
A red kite’s severed leg, along with wing tags that had been fitted to a sateliite-tracked red kite, hidden in holes covered with moss.
Six illegal baited spring traps set in the open.
A trapped hen harrier (still alive) caught in an illegally set spring trap.
A poisoned bait.
Four leg rings previously fitted to golden eagle chicks found in the possession of a gamekeeper.
A 20-year-old gamekeeper (James Rolfe – straight out of game-keeping college) was charged with possession of the dead red kite and was fined £1,500. No charges were ever brought against anyone for any of the other offences.
Previous blogs on Moy: see here, here, here and here. It’s particularly worth having a look at this, especially in light of recent hen harrier ‘disappearances’ in England. They weren’t necessarily shot (as the grouse-shooting industry keeps telling us) – they could just as easily have been trapped like this (as the grouse-shooting industry keeps forgetting to mention).
The gamekeeper on Moy was convicted four years ago in 2011. Since then, several more satellite-tracked red kites have ‘disappeared’ since their last signals emitted from Moy, and several buzzard and goshawk nests seem to fail each year. It’s quite windy at Moy. It was probably the wind that blew off those rings from the young golden eagles’ legs and blew them straight in to a jar inside the gamekeeper’s house. It was probably the wind that severed the leg of the red kite and then blew it in to a hole on the moor and then blew moss over the hole to cover it. It was probably the wind that blew away the more recent ‘missing’ red kites. It was probably the same wind that blew holes in those buzzard and goshawk nests, too. Still no breeding hen harriers on this estate – yep, must have been blown away.
Well I was going to write a post on this but Master Delingpole has done it for me. Read the Truth about the Royal Society for the Persecution of Birds HERE.
Apologies for the Google translation but hopefully you will get the gist. The weasels are squealing whilst reality has dawned!
Danes stop energy revolution
The Danish government wants to slow down the development of wind and solar energy. It takes more coal power in purchase to “relieve economy” the.
STOCKHOLM taz | “What do you actually complained,” tweeted the weekend a local politician of the Danish Left: “The government only ensures that there will be not less but more offshore wind power.One must wait until the sea level has risen correspondingly simple. “
So much gallows humor had not others. “Idiots! I’m speechless, “said the former Climate and Energy Minister Martin Lidegaard. WWF climate chief John Nordbo spoke of a “massacre of the Danish climate policy”.
The fact that the ruling in Copenhagen quite liberal Venstre wants to end the former leadership of Denmark in climate policy, was already emerging.Slices, the climate targets of previous governments had been withdrawn since last year. Late last week, came the decisive change. One of the German EEG levy similar tax, which previously co-financed the transformation of energy, shall be deleted gradually from 2017th
This “PSO levy”, from the proceeds of which green investments in wind and solar power production are supported, had been introduced already 1998th In its present form it has existed since 2007. The PSO levy is essential responsibility for ensuring that Denmark with a wind power share of over 40 percent of electricity production now Wind power “champion” is. By 2050, Denmark should even be completely independent of fossil fuels.
The PSO levy appears on the electricity bill of all Danish households and businesses and is designed so that it at a current price reduction of 2 Öre to 1 öre (0.13 euro cents) increases, decreases accordingly at a current price increase. Converted approximately one billion euros annually flow through it at present in the state treasury. The budget gap is now open to balancing the government with a corresponding retraction in the promotion of green electricity.
Specifically, this would mean that the plans would have to be stopped for five new offshore wind farms. “Our goal, Copenhagen by 2025” CO 2 neutral “to make is sabotaged,” said Jesper Pedersen, wind power chief of Hofor, the municipal energy company complained. The millions that have already been put into planning, were thus thrown away money. From an “unimaginable energy policy breach” spoke: Ján Hylleberg, director of the Wind Energy Industry Association. The Swedish state-owned energy company Vattenfall announced that it will stop its investments in Denmark, if the government implementing its plans.
“Venstre” establishes the energy policy pivot so that industrial electricity consumers should be relieved to be internationally competitive again. “As we anticipate increasing power consumption, there is also a growing CO2 give emissions,” said environment minister Lars Christian Lilleholt.
Denmark industry have already much lower electricity costs than comparable EU countries like Germany, however, said Brian Vad Mathiesen, a professor of energy planning in Aalborg. Pranks to the PSO levy, it’ll be a real subsidy equal. Due to the lower electricity price levels, the energy transition for Danish consumers had so far come much cheaper than originally calculated, also stressed Ex-Energy Minister Lidegaard: therefore there is no reason to cancel the PSO.
Whilst the rest of Europe fails miserably to meet it’s targets the UK is still in thrall to the Climate acts. We do still have a lot of very stupid people in powerful positions in Westminster. The Fifth Carbon Budget resume by Christopher Booker makes uncomfortable reading. The Lunatics are still in charge of the Asylum despite the changes made in the Energy Act 2016. There is little point in adding to the detail in this article so just click the link. Until such as Lord Debden (‘let them eat burgers’ Gummer) ,Tim (the trougher) Yeo and the ‘Baroness’ (FoE Climate Change Campaigner and Labour Peer) Worthington*are consigned to history, preferably in a locked and padded room, we will still have this festering sore supporting the “Science”(an oxymoron if ever there was) of Climate. In reality what we have is a certain cadre amongst the political ‘elite’ and the Westminster village to whom stupidity and self interest sit close side by side. The infection of Groupthink engenders the image of sheeples rather that of Critical Thinking.
*Lady Worthington launched Sandbag in 2008 to raise public awareness of and improve the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Initially Sandbag provided members of the public with a way of tackling climate change, enabling them to buy ETS permits and cancel them, meaning that European companies covered by the ETS would have to emit fewer greenhouse gasses. Since that time, Sandbag has changed and grown. With a general remit to ‘defend against climate risk’, Sandbag now focuses on researching and suggesting improvements to the ETS, how to phase out coal-fired power stations in Europe, and how governments and the EU can work to support Carbon Capture and Storage. Lady Worthington has been Sandbag’s Director since its foundation.
As the Energy Bill which includes the removal of all onshore subsidies for new wind farm applications moves towards Royal Assent we need to address the next issue. All those existing wind farms that are still getting subsidies and could do for the next twenty five years. Simple remedy comes in two swathes. Reduce the ROCs entitlement from 0.9 per MW output to 0.4 or less halving at a stroke the income from subsidy and then repeal the climate act and reduce or remove the renewable obligation from energy retailers. As ROCs are a traded entity we would then have thousands of ROCs chasing a must smaller obligation, or none at all. This would reduce the value of ROCs to that of monopoly money. At a stroke the subsidy would be valueless and that cost would be removed from consumer and industry bills reducing fuel poverty and increasing the competitivity of our industry. For the Renewable Industry the Bubble would truly have burst!
The Battle is won but the War against Wind continues!
Latest news on the Energy Act 2016
Following agreement by both Houses on the text of the Bill it received Royal Assent on 12 May. The Bill is now an Act of Parliament (law).