A Danish study, paid by the taxpayers with more than €2.6 million, supported by some of Europe’s largest wind turbine manufacturers Vestas, hand in hand with Siemens and Vattenfalls, has identified the scale and professional communications of the anti wind movements all over the world. The Danish wind power industry complains that it is increasingly difficult to find acceptance for their projects in the local communities. Could it be that local communities value their quality of life over the wind developers greed?
Should this EU funding have been used to spy on the people of Europe for commercial intelligence. As most of the wind information goes, the standard of the data is poor identifying only 323 groups against the 2000+ groups in existence. Denmark alone has 200 such action groups. What is concerning is that an English University should have been involved. As well as targeting groups this survey also targeted what they loosely define as “critical people”. That does smack of an extremely unpleasant totalitarian state and the worst atrocities of some regimes. Is this the future of the European Federal state? Will we next have secret policemen going through our rubbish and hacking our computers. We know the wind pimps aren’t above doing that now. The collection of data within this report goes beyond commercial intelligence and is extremely a concerning. One might suggest as concerning as Angela Merkel having her phone tapped by the CIA. We should always remember, as Corporal Jones is won’t to say-“They don’t like it up ’em”
Called the Carbon Capture Report, it is only mollified by the horrendously poor quality of the information. If Vesta, Seimens and Vattenfalls paid €2.6 million for this, they should ask for a REFUND!!!
Energy Generation Stats
windfarmaction 
They should definitely ask for a refund – they have scratched the surface of what is a tremendous networking, added to on a daily basis. The ‘study’ covers a tiny percentage of groups; does not include countries with whom the UK has enormous interaction; ignores many other wind-critical sites and independents. Oh and…..they’ve wasted all that money because we would have given them the information for free
They also grouped many Canadian sites under the U.S. label. In fact most of the sites listed as being from the U.S. are in fact, in Canada.
If they can’t even separate 2 distinct countries, how good is the rest of their research?